Skip to content
Return to British Red Cross blog home

Red Cross Blogs

Blogs highlighting the work of staff and volunteers within the British Red Cross, part of the largest humanitarian organisation movement in the world.


Why the Red Cross gives first aid training to the Taliban

By Sarah Oughton
May 26, 2010 at 3:30 pm

An update by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) about their operations in Afghanistan has made the newspapers today.

So I thought I’d explain why it shouldn’t really come as a surprise that the Red Cross provides medical kits and first aid training to the Taliban – as reported in the Guardian and other papers.

The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement is based on fundamental principles of impartiality and neutrality. Because of this, it provides humanitarian services to all affected by armed conflict, which of course includes all those directly involved in the fighting, as well as civilians.

Under the Geneva Conventions the ICRC provides medical care for all people injured in a conflict, regardless of which side they’re on – the armed forces are also bound by this and provide medical assistance to opposing combatants when possible.

Since 2006, the International Committee of the Red Cross has organised first aid training in Afghanistan both with the Afghan police and armed opposition members. These training sessions are also an opportunity to train all parties to the conflict in international humanitarian law.

These opportunities to educate ‘non-state actors’ – groups involved in a conflict that aren’t a formal state and therefore are not formally signed up to the Geneva Conventions – in the laws of war are invaluable.

One part of that education is explaining that there are relevant rules of international humanitarian law that apply to all parties to a conflict, regardless of whether or not they are a state.

As a movement, the Red Cross’ neutrality is what makes it effective. In many countries and contexts around the world, it gives it access to people in dire humanitarian need who would otherwise go without assistance.

To get that neutrality, we need credibility with all parties to a conflict and we need to engage with them equally. If the Red Cross takes sides or is seen to take sides, its neutrality and its ability to help people, including civilians, during a conflict are compromised.

Image: ICRC


Comments (29) »

Tags: ,

The Red Cross values comments both complimentary and critical. However, we will not tolerate the following: aggressive or personal criticism of the blogger, breach of copyright, obscene, defamatory, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive or likewise objectionable comments.


  • http://andrewjgrimm.wordpress.com Andrew Grimm

    When did the Red Cross first give first aid training to “non-state actors”? And do you provide first aid training to US and UK troops?

  • MADDISON DAVIES

    i will not shop in a red cross shop again the TALIBAN KILLED MY SON A ROYAL MARINE
    SO YOU HAVE LOST MY SUPPORT

  • Don Allen

    I am disgusted to think that I have supported the RED CROSS,in giving them stuff to sell in their charity shops,to find out they are training the Taliban in first aid.the red cross has just lost my support.I wont even go into their shop again,And this information must go worldwide on facebook.

  • http://twitter.com/melph Matt

    some people here are clearly having difficulty with the concept of neutrality

  • Jools

    You do not deserve the space you have given to put your comment on here, when you have to visit your son with half his face blown off fighting for justice in a country that does not even want justice or even understand the meaning of it then you can comment. They live by ancient laws and should be left to live this way. They are vicious and cold hearted and cowardly in the way they fight……………………………Go away Millie , or maby sign up for the red cross and work your way through the minefields as you try and help the Taliban.

  • http://andrewjgrimm.wordpress.com Andrew Grimm

    At a minimum, being neutral would mean providing training to US and UK forces as well.

  • http://twitter.com/BritishRedCross British Red Cross

    Hi Andrew. Yes, the International Red Cross provides first aid training to everyone regardless of who they are – including US and UK troops. Providing medical assistance with complete neutrality is a key part of the Red Cross' mandate.

    For the avoidance of doubt, please do bear in mind that the article is about the work of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) which is a separate entity to the British Red Cross. For further information about this distinction, see this page: http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/5...

  • http://twitter.com/BritishRedCross British Red Cross

    Sorry to hear that you feel that way Don. However, neutrality and impartiality are, and always have been, fundamental principles of the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement. They are also critical in ensuring that the Red Cross can provide assistance to anyone, anywhere.

    For full explanations of why neutrality is so important to the Movement, please see this page for more information from the ICRC http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/5...

    This page on our own site explains how the British Red Cross fits into the movement: http://www.redcross.org.uk/TLC.asp?id=86759

  • LInda

    Ah the good old british Red Cross, arent these the same gang who stopped selling xmas cards in their charity shops for fear of causing offence to other religions?

  • http://twitter.com/zeno001 Alan Henness

    It is because of this neutrality and impartiality that I fully support the Red Cross and I recognise that without this and the other Fundamental Principles, the Red Cross and Red Crescent movement would not be able to do the work it does, helping *anyone* in crisis.

  • karen waspe

    I can't believe the Red Cross is helping the very cowards that leave bombs for our troops to stand on. My son as several others have been blown to pieces by these gutless terrorists, don't ever expect any support from myself or my family and friends !!!!!!!!!

  • karen waspe

    Matt go and spend a week with the forces in Afghanistan the tell me you still want to be neutral !!!!!

  • karen waspe

    Well how neutral is that Linda, as usual we all have to bend over backwards not to upset them !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Diane

    Have to say that I totally agree with Don and all the other people who are appauled that the Red Cross are supporting the Taliban. Its our boys, girls, husbands, wives, brothers & sister that are fighting and dying for this country. The British Red Cross should support our troops. Don't you think their job is hard enough without giving the Taliban a helping hand?

  • Iain

    The Red Cross wont be getting another penny from me….

  • Diane

    Matt, you really have no idea of neutrality either. . . The Taliban uses children pack them up with bombs and then send them to the Army bases. . . . and yes, they then blow them up.
    Surely getting hold of the kids would be a better way of supporting the people of Afghanistan.

  • Iain

    Why don't you get yourself over to Ireland and help train the (R)IRA and the (C)IRA while your at it…..

  • Iain

    Matt i've saw what the taliban do to their own people, They are nothing but terrorist scum.

  • Karen Meeks

    Now this is a travesty. To a degree, I can understand your international humanitarian laws. No person should be discriminated due to race, color, or creed. That would be the humanitarian thing to do. I believe that there are exceptions to the “rules”. And this would definately be one of those exceptions. The Taliban have their own set of rules and they are not of any humanitarian nature. The Taliban wish to wipe out Nations of people that do not believe in their God. May the atrosoties of September 11, 2001 on American soil NEVER be forgotten . Troops from around the world fight to stop such atrocities. Atrocities committed by the Taliban, of UNHUMAN nature…purely evil. And you feel that it is acceptable to offer assistance to such evilness? In our great country, the United States of America, we rule by majority. I could guarantee that if the American people knew about this, the vast majority of people would not support this. If you firmly believe that what you are doing for the Taliban is humanitarian and the right thing to do, I think it should be known to the public. Citizens should know what their donations are going towards. It should be on the front page of every news paper in every country for all to see. I, for one, can no longer support a cause such as this. And will make sure that every single person I know is aware of this. And within my great country, I have the right to make it know. Perhaps a huge sign attached to the window on my vehicle, a quick phone call to the local newspaper or television station to get started.

  • Karen Meeks

    And to think that I have donated to a cause that is offering assistance to the very evilness that my nephew is trying to help abolish, makes me sick to my stomach. You aid in helping nurse an injured Taliban back to health so that he can kill more people!!! What in the name of God?!?! Mankind? How do you sleep at night??

  • Millie

    I am so surprised at the comments being left here. I don't know about anyone else, but I like to read up on a charity before I give money to them, to make sure I actually do support the aims I'm fundig. It therefore comes as no surprise to me that the Red Cross help the Taliban, given their founding Principles. Thus my support will not waver now that a newspaper has decided to turn their neutrality into a story. I continue to applaud the Red Cross for providing aid and medical help to those that need it, regardless of religion/race/etc.

    And some of these commenters would do well to remember that the Taliban recruit soldiers just like everyone else – I'm sure we have troops over there that do not support the war but are simply doing their jobs, as they have been instructed to do. Not everyone joins a war by choice, and not everyone has the luxury of trained medics who will fly them home if needed.

  • jack

    I stopped supporting the Red Cross when it became the Red Crescent.

  • American Soldier

    I also wil never donate again, and will ensure that my family dosent as well. I am currently in Afghanistan figting the taliban. I have seen them hurl grenades and hurt innocent children, and blow themselves up and kill innocent people. And yet you would offer them aid to continue doing what they do? Why not use this money towards something more worthwhile like haiti, or some other country in need. I am appauled at this!

  • Miranda

    It's sometimes tough to understand, but I guess that it's by giving things like first aid training that the ICRC can gain access to people who they might otherwise have no contact with. If they can have any influence over people anywhere in the world who take up arms in terms of them understanding the rules of International Humanitarian Law – if that saves just one life – then surely that has to be a good thing?

  • Emily

    I think what we have to understand is that these concepts are in play during every situation, and that is what allows the Red Cross to function and do a lot of the good work that they do. By remaining impartial they SAVE lives. It is what allows them to operate in Thailand and provide medical assistance to both the protesters and government troops…if the red cross took a stance against providing humanitarian assistance to the Taliban and violated their founding principals it would not be long before they were kicked out of Haiti, Sri Lanka, China, and Indonesia. Why would they be allowed to remain in Afghanistan to support our troops?

    The Red Cross is above politics, they are not a government and as such even if we don't like it in all cases…they see the people who are hurting and suffering. The people who have sisters, fathers, mothers, aunts, and nephews who want to see them come home. Culture is ingrain in us, it is taught, but in conflict we need to see beyond these things, people hurt regardless of their color, religion, culture, or beliefs.

  • http://twitter.com/BenStickley Ben Stickley

    Karen, Can I suggest you look at the work of the armed forces own medics? They treat all injured combatants and prioritise according to need. In our own army bases in Afganistan they as you put it “nurse injured Taliban back to health”. That is because civilized people show that they do not stoop to the same level.

  • Tom Leveridge

    Last year the British Red Cross made hundreds of thousands of pounds through selling Christmas cards in their shops across the country and online.

    I bought a pack of 10, looking forward to the new set coming out in August, check the shop online for more details! :-)

  • Anonymous

    If you give aid , comfort or support to your country’s enemies you prolong the conflict and suffering of war and are a traitor.

  • Mike

    ”And some of these commenters would do well to remember that the Taliban recruit soldiers just like everyone else” WHAT A LOAD OF RUBIISH!!! please dont coment on thing you know nothing about!!! you have the right to voice your opinion not to state untrue facts! the taliban has volunters and also a large percentage of recruits are forced into joining usually by threats to them, there familys and villages, i know this first hand as i have seen the evidence with my own eyes! i have also seen the after affects of what these creatures (i say creatures as i cannot bring myself to call any group who can accept doing these discusing things as normal humanbeings) do to small children (males usually) .So how stupid is it to help these creatures??? and keep prolonging this awful war, it makes no sense at all, and besides this, all the taliban boast they embrace death and that is why islam will rule the world! so why would they want or need the red cross???? anyone who thinks they should receive any sort of help or aid is either ill imformed or has somthing wrong with them!