Mary Atkinson, British Red Cross food security adviser, talks about hunger and malnutrition – an issue affecting more people than the combined populations of the United States, Canada and the European Union (U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization).
1. How is the British Red Cross tackling hunger and malnutrition?
As a food security adviser when I talk about hunger, it’s not the sort of hunger I feel when I haven’t had time for a lunch break – it is repeated feelings of hunger from constantly not having enough food and the worry that goes with not knowing where your next meal is coming from. It’s a result of people’s success or lack of it at generating enough income or growing enough food to meet their needs.
So we support people’s livelihoods, helping those in agriculture to grow food and helping people get better yields and better income from their outputs. We also support other income generating activities because hunger is mostly about access to food and not the amount of food that’s available. Most farmers still have to purchase the majority of their food.
Addressing hunger can only be done by achieving food security in the longer term in a sustainable way. In Africa there’s low production per hectare, so we need to make sure people use more productive and sustainable, methods of agriculture production to help preserve the natural assets such as land and water, which are vital for farming. Adapting to climate change is another issue, which can be best done through helping people prepare for and cope with natural disasters such as droughts and floods, as well as adapt to an increasingly less reliable climate, which threatens their ability to get enough food to eat or sell.
2. How can work on tackling hunger and malnutrition be improved?
Most experts around the world agree how important it is to support small-scale farmers, who represent 70 per cent of poor people in developing countries – that includes pastoralists, who tend livestock. Improving their livelihoods helps take them out of poverty. Also there’s a need to intensify local food production – so people are less reliant on imported food, which has become increasingly more expensive.
We all know prices of food are rising on the global market and the world’s population is predicted to rise to 9 billion by 2050. With many more mouths to feed we need to grow more food using limited natural resources, but with rapidly rising global obesity we also need to reduce over consumption. Food production needs to focus on ecologically green methods to preserve the environment and reduce green house gas emissions of which agriculture currently contributes one third. We need to think about the longer term and ensure approaches to tackle the issue are integrated with public health programming.
3. What are we doing well? What programmes have been successful?
We work with two excellent Red Cross National Societies in Lesotho and Zimbabwe, who are really experienced and skilled in supporting smallholder farmers. They use conservation approaches and encourage growing vegetables in home gardens to provide more nutritious diets.
They also look at the issue of HIV in the communities, as having nutritious food is vital for anti-retroviral medication to work effectively and save people’s lives. The development of keyhole gardens is an innovative approach which started in Lesotho – it’s a less labour intensive way of growing food which makes a huge difference for those with health issues. The gardens can also provide more income from sale of extra food.
We also provide support to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies’ responses to food crises. We have a roster of people skilled in food security assessments and programme design who we send overseas to give technical support. For example, we contributed to the Federation’s east Africa strategy to help communities who frequently experience acute periods of food insecurity become more resilient in the long term.
4. Certain areas in the world seem stuck in a cycle of hunger and poverty, so why should people donate money to our work? Is it really making a difference?
They are stuck in a cycle due to an ongoing problem of poverty and other issues relating to politics and policy, which we don’t directly engage in ourselves. Our priority is to help the vulnerable. It’s not easy to solve the issue of poverty but we can help people help themselves with the resources they have available to improve their situation. The Lesotho Red Cross and Zimbabwe Red Cross have evidence our support makes a big difference to people and they become more self-sufficient with food and income.
5. Benny Dembitzer said: “We are not talking of small bleeps on the horizon; there is now a permanent state of food shortages affecting between one third and one quarter of humanity. We have to deal with the perfect storm of world starvation. A new approach is urgently needed.” What is your response to this statement?
I think it is a bit misleading as we have surpluses of food even in places where people with hunger live. At the moment there isn’t a food shortage at all, though people lack access to food. We have more than enough food globally, however with another two billion people the supply of food becomes more critical. We can’t carry on as business as usual, in which the west and increasing numbers of richer people in the developing countries consume too much food – we have a problem of excess resulting in high rates of obesity and related diseases, and we throw away around a third of our food. So there is a perfect storm, but it’s to do with both rising hunger and obesity reflecting rising global inequalities. We have to recognise that we are part of the problem and we have to start eating more sustainable diets.
So although focusing on producing more food is important, it is equally important to make the point about poor people living in developing countries having a problem of access to food. We all need to understand that it is not just about supply – access, i.e. money to buy food, is also critical.
Also, intensifying food production has to be done in a sustainable way and take climate change into account. How we do this, is the issue. Beyond 2050 the population will stabilise. We need to prioritise and collectively understand and address this issue with a common approach.
Read about why conflict in Mali will increase hunger




Very good work Sarah..!
Can you trace who is actually being fed? Or is that kind of information not available through the Red Cross. I would like to know where food is not being shared freely. I love your work and enjoyed meeting one of your street representatives in Canterbury (Jade). It’s good to meet people who have a purpose in life.
Thanks both for your comments!
Tina – to answer your question, it’s not really an issue of ‘food not being shared freely’ but it’s about lack of access to food that is available in local markets due to lack of income to purchase it. People who live in poverty cannot afford all the food they need and so live in hunger – what they need is to be able to make a living and provide for themselves rather than having to rely on food that is shared with them for free.
Thanks for the great article Sara. I appreciate the fact that Ms Atkinson makes the case for making food security and accessibility a part of public health planning in the developing world. Access to nutritious and affordable food is as important as vaccines and other medical intervention … the two are linked and necessary to ensure welfare for the most vulnerable. I look forward to part 2 of the interview!
Regards, Rabab Pettitt
Good job Sarah!
The problem isn’t only the hunger…the main question is about inequality that supports and lives harmonically with poverty…
Hugs from Brazil!
One important aspect of the nutrition issue may be more undernutrition than malnutrition. In my involvement with smallholder agriculture I find that most smallholders are fortunate to have access to 2000 kcal/day or marginally enough to meet basic metabolism needs, with nothing available to undertake heavy manual agriculture labor. However, many programs aimed at improving smallholder agriculture are deliberately labor intensive and carries the expectation of poor hungry farmers working full time in their fields. This requires a daily diet in excess of 4000 kcal/day. The result is that smallholder farmers can only diligently work a few hours a day, perhaps longer by pacing thier work with less diligence. Ultimately it takes up to 8 weeks for basic crop establishment which is well past the timing needed for improved yield potential. Thus the need to look at balancing the dietary energy with work exectations. How many calories smallholder have access to, how many hours this will allow them to diligently undertake field work, the extent the limited calories will delay field work and untimately the impact on food security. If this was done the efforts to assist smallholders could easily shift from labor intensive to drudgery relief, and lead to more effective programs for rural poverty alleviation.
Please visit:
http://www.smallholderagriculture.com/ and
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~rtinsley/CalorieEnergyBalance.htm
Thank you,
Dick Tinsley
How to tackle hunger and Malnutrition.
Smallholder farmers need to be assisted with farm inputs eg fertilizer subsidy programmes. They are able to grow more food enough to eat for the whole year and also sell some. But the challenge is the prices they get on the market does not enable farmers to recover the cost of production.If we were to cost the labour they put in when growing crops the price must be fixed to make sure the smallholder farmer is compesated. Otherwise smallholder farmers are treated as slaves. There is heavy exploitation on poor smallholder farmers.