Asylum seekers are called a lot of things in the press: freeloaders, scroungers, here to suck this country dry. So are we really the ‘El Dorado’ of Europe – a place of riches and gold that people flock to in droves?
If you feel like we give away too much of a good thing, then let’s take a moment to go through the bill.
Updated September 2015.
First of all, here are some things an asylum seeker can’t get…
Income support.
Housing benefit.
That’s because asylum seekers don’t receive mainstream welfare benefits – the kind of safety net given to UK nationals.
So what exactly does the government give them?
When someone claims asylum in the UK, they are allowed to wait here as the government looks at their case. While this goes on, they receive £36.95 a week.
That’s a measly £5 a day for things like food, toiletries and clothes. Even with housing paid for, it must be hard to hide the hunger.
It’s worth flagging that there are some variations on this sum. For instance, you can get £5 more if you have a baby under one.
It’s still not very much. It’s just a fraction of income support and way below the poverty line (£177 or less a week, for a single person; £264 for a couple). And sometimes this situation drags on for years.
But it all costs the British taxpayer.
These ‘costs’ are often mentioned in the same breath as immigration policy or net migration. This confuses the issue, as asylum seekers are here for different reasons.
Some papers do cite big, scary numbers about asylum support – but when you break down the figures, the amount actually becomes very small. A budget of £155 million is around £5 a year for each taxpayer.
That means a small amount of money – just over 1p a day – will help people who have fled traumatic and terrifying experiences, such as rape, torture and murder. It’s the sort of loose change that rattles at the bottom of your rucksack.
Even so – this might be enough to lure them here.
Imagine saying goodbye to everything you know. Your home. Your country. Familiar places and views you love.
And apart from your children and partner, who you can maybe bring over to join you, you’re probably parting from friends and loved ones forever. That includes mum and dad.
To leave everything behind and start over, you need to be pushed – not pulled.
Besides, this kind of thinking isn’t backed up by the figures. In fact, 86% of people flee to a neighbouring country, over the border, rather than come to the UK. Those who do reach Europe are far more likely to go to Germany, Sweden, France or Italy.
And it’s unlikely that anyone would risk their life to get to the UK, to live off £5 a day.
If life is so difficult here, why don’t they just get a job?
They can’t. They’re not allowed.
If an asylum seeker waits longer than 12 months for a decision on whether they can stay, they can then request some work. But realistically, the system is against them even if they get the green light.
They can only apply for jobs on the UK’s ‘shortage occupation list’ – and many of these are highly skilled and specialist. Nuclear services manager from Eritrea, anyone?
Even if there is something they can do, they probably won’t get the job. Their qualifications might not be valid here, despite years of education. There may be some language issues, too – especially if we’re talking about complex terms in neurophysiology. Then there’s the stigma of being an asylum seeker, which might put off employers.
It means that we are failing to let people be a part of the UK, in the way that they could.
We have spoken to highly skilled people who used to be doctors, social workers, lawyers and journalists.
They really would like nothing more than to feel useful and valued again – and contribute to this country and economy.
Donate to the Europe Refugee Crisis Appeal
Find out more
Go straight to the source
- Asylum support in the UK
- Working in the UK while an asylum case is considered
- Income support in the UK
Help us get the story straight
- Keep the conversation going: #factsnotfear
- Read our other blogs in the series
Jan 25, 2016 @ 03:00:00
They’re lucky to be here. They aren’t refugees anyway; once you’ve crossed the first safe country to go to another, you become a migrant.
Jan 26, 2016 @ 10:23:03
Hi Jeff,
The UN’s 1951 Refugee Convention does not place an obligation on individuals to apply for asylum in the first country they reach.
As a neutral and impartial humanitarian organisation, we do not take a view on people’s decisions as to what countries to flee to or claim asylum in. We are focused on supporting and responding to the needs of refugees regardless of the journey they have taken.
Oct 09, 2016 @ 11:51:57
Hi Sam,
You could probably better support these economic migrants better without having such expensive offices in central London or having managers driving very expensive cars. As I know someone who worked at the Red Cross, I know how little actually goes towards the people you claim to raise money for.
Oct 17, 2016 @ 12:42:38
Hi Mark,
Anyone can see exactly how much money goes towards helping people in crisis in our annual trustees’ reports and accounts which we publish in full every year. For the full details of our income and expenditure you can download the latest copy on our website using this link.
Kind regards,
Ros
Dec 31, 2018 @ 16:06:33
Hello Rosalind Knight,
I tried your link to your website within which I was hoping to see evidence that ‘The Red Cross’ doesn’t pay it’s top employees huge amounts. Unfortunatly the link was/is broken. I did some research myself and discovered that The Red Cross pays a top salary of a whopping £173,000. Here is the link; https://www.thirdsector.co.uk/charity-pay-study-2017-highest-earners/special-report/article/1427306
How do you respond to this ?
All the best, Jon Davey
Jan 03, 2019 @ 14:44:33
Hi Jon,
I’m sorry that the link to our annual report page was broken – this is because we updated our website and some pages now have new URLs. The current page is https://www.redcross.org.uk/about-us/how-we-are-run/our-finances/annual-reports-and-accounts. Our remuneration policy, which applies to all employees, aims to offer remuneration that is fair and appropriate for the roles performed and the responsibilities undertaken to deliver our charitable aim of refusing to ignore people in crisis. The British Red Cross employs people based on their skills and competencies and expects to pay at a level comparable to that in the public sector and the charity sector. Salaries are benchmarked against non-profit organisations of similar complexity including other charities and local authorities.
I hope this helps to answer your question. Thank you for contacting us, Diana
Aug 27, 2020 @ 15:57:49
Here, here.
Oct 21, 2017 @ 13:54:58
The big problem is,we see refugees getting off their ramshackle boats and notice very few women and children,mostly young men , between 18 and 25 years of age.People ask them why they don’t stay and fight for their freedom? They answer,”We prefer to come to Western countries for a good ,secure life ,jobs and money” That’s not a refugee,that’s an economic migrant.
It’s not what I want to hear or see,my heart goes out to refugees,but I’m unhappy about the latter explanation,if true.
Oct 30, 2019 @ 12:27:49
The Red Cross are clearly taking a political stance here instead of providing what they were original there for i.e to provide medical aid. If they wish to look after people in need there are more than enough UK pensioners and people living on our streets who could benefit from aid . Aiding so many asylum seekers just encourages more to come..
Aug 22, 2020 @ 13:44:13
Wow, such a shame to read these comments. I was rather hoping to ask if this post is likely to be updated, as it’d be great to share if it’s still current.
Aug 24, 2020 @ 17:33:37
Hi Kate, Thank you for offering to share this blog post. We have not updated this piece, but have written a number of new articles on refugees and asylum seekers on our new platform, Stories, which includes a section on refugees, asylum seekers and migration. You might be especially interested in this article, Six things you need to know about refugees and asylum seekers. Best wishes, Diana
Aug 27, 2020 @ 15:56:46
When we are in a great time of need in our own country, then anything given to refugees, migrants is too much. We have our own children facing hunger, homelessness & deprivation, that extra £37 would help so many of our own.